Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Discipull clothing
=[[Discipull clothing]]=
:{{la|Discipull clothing}} ([{{fullurl:Discipull clothing|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Discipull clothing}}&action=delete}} delete]) –
Subject does not appear to meet notability requirements. Could not locate significant coverage in independent reliable sources. I had originally nominated the article for speedy deletion but initial contributor stated he was actively working on the article including adding sourcing, so I self-reverted but expressly reserved the right to nominate at AfD if notability assertion was not provided. He has not been back since. --Clubjuggle T/C 14:54, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete I could not find any independent and reliable sources with coverage of the subject of the article, and there are no such refs included now. I fixed the ref formatting so the 2 refs are viewable, but they seem like passing ref in bloggy online sites. Fails WP:N. Come back when the film or the product become notable. Edison (talk) 15:07, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - not notable, we're not here to promote his clothing line and forthcoming DVD. JohnCD (talk) 17:25, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:37, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:37, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy delete G7. Author has blanked the page. --Clubjuggle T/C 13:00, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.