Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DisneyMixer

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Confirmed blatant hoax by serial offender. Mgm|(talk) 10:03, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

=[[DisneyMixer]]=

:{{la|DisneyMixer}} ([{{fullurl:DisneyMixer|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DisneyMixer}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

:{{la|DisneyMixer 2}} ([{{fullurl:DisneyMixer 2|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DisneyMixer}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

:{{la|DisneyMixer 3}} ([{{fullurl:DisneyMixer 3|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DisneyMixer}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Another set of speculative Disney albums going under the WP:HAMMER AndrewHowse (talk) 15:36, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

  • Delete for now per WP:NALBUMS. Additionally, articles are completely unsourced. Google search of "Disney Mixer" turned up kitchen appliances. Wouldn't be opposed once criteria are met. KuyaBriBriTalk 18:02, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete More hoaxism from the Disneymania Vandal, who has already been taken to AfD here, here, here, and here; hallmarks are usually writing hoax album articles which try to rationalize the hot artists of today will still be in Disney's stable two years from now. Article creator should be indeffed for socking and hoaxing. Nate • (chatter) 19:11, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete the lot, no notability per WP:MUSIC#Albums.  Esradekan Gibb  "Talk" 22:42, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete all (G3) as blatant hoaxery. May I also ask why this now-serial hoaxist has not been blocked, yet? MuZemike 23:38, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

:*Because each outbreak is under a new account. At least some of them are blocked, and then in turn are abandoned I guess. --AndrewHowse (talk) 01:03, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.