Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DoItYourself.com 2

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 20:27, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

=[[DoItYourself.com]]=

AfDs for this article:

{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DoItYourself.com}}

:{{la|DoItYourself.com}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/DoItYourself.com_2 Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|DoItYourself.com}})

Does not establish notability per the general notability guideline in that it fails to provide (multiple) reliable source(s) covering the entity in detail. A brief GNEWS search found nothing but trivial mentions and SEO-type referral links. The previous AFD in 2010 made no assessment of this specific page. Izno (talk) 14:12, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 August 17. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:23, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 14:55, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:29, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 15:21, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

delete References in article are passing mentions. Could not find anything notable about the website. Fails GNG. CerealKillerYum (talk) 14:07, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 13:32, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Delete The important facts in this article are that it was created by someone and then acquired by someone else, and those facts are unreferenced. I think its inclusion on the list of companies on the internet Brands page is more than adequate. The best source for anyone interested in the article subject is probably the page itself... Its history is minimally notable. New Media Theorist (talk) 15:43, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.