Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doc scott

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. kur ykh 02:18, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

=[[Doc scott]]=

:{{la|Doc scott}} ([{{fullurl:Doc scott|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doc scott}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Unreferenced BLP. Notability is not clear. POV issues. -- Mufka ^(u) ^(t) ^(c) 01:25, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Delete - poorly written, unreferenced, does not utilise NPOV guidelines, --tennis man 01:44, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
Delete unless independent verifiable sources can be found that establish notability.Nrswanson (talk) 02:07, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:12, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:12, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:13, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
Delete NN. MBisanz ^talk 03:22, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
Delete NN is right JBsupreme (talk) 05:29, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.