Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doddaballapur in Banks

:{{la|Doddaballapur in Banks}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Doddaballapur_in_Banks Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Doddaballapur in Banks}})

Not very clear what the article is about. Seems like some list of banks, but no sources, no evidence of notability. Vanjagenije (talk) 13:06, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

• Delete. I'm fairly sure that this is a list of banks in Doddaballapur. Even setting aside the lack of references or the dubious (if not machine-translated) English, the core problem here is that Wikipedia's just not the place for this local treatment of banking facilities. Theoretically, this could redirect to List of banks in India, but I think the odd title makes outright deletion the way to go. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 15:02, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:15, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:15, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:16, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

• Delete -A list of banks in a city? Ideally, if sourced, it should in the city article. I would agree calling title odd that preserving it as redirect either to city article or anything else would serve no purpose. It doesn't seems like a likely search term. I mean, it is grammatically incorrect, banks happen to establish themselves in city, how a city in bank? Anupmehra -Let's talk! 04:36, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.