Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dodirni mi kolena

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Dodirni mi kolena}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Dodirni mi kolena}})

Non-notable album. Fails WP:SIGCOV. scope_creep^Talk 14:57, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Serbia. Shellwood (talk) 15:42, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

• Well, all the covers have to indicate at least some level of long-term significance, at least for the eponymous song. Did you check those sources that appear in a Google Books search for Zana "Dodirni mi kolena"? --Joy (talk) 09:52, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

::{{ping|Joy}} Per WP:THREE which is best practice, can you post them up there so I can have a look at them. Thanks. scope_creep^Talk 10:01, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

:::I don't actually care that much to argue either way, I'm just asking if that was part of your WP:BEFORE routine. --Joy (talk) 10:11, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

• Delete. Looking at the Google Books references (to address the above discussion), only one book mentions the subject twice; the others all only mention it once. I don't see the subject passing WP:SIGCOV. --Richard Yin (talk) 03:05, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
• Keep. The album and several singles were, and still are, highly popular in the former Yugoslavia. Under the legacy section, it is noted that songs from the album have been covered by other artists and achieved significant success with listeners. — Sadko (words are wind) 23:12, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

::The fact they popular doesnt' give them an automatic right to Wikipedia article. Is there coverage per WP:COVERAGE per WP:THREE. The gbook passing mentions are insufficient. This is place were discuss notability. A simple keep !vote doesn't cover any longer and hasn't since 2006. If you have evidence post it up. scope_creep^Talk 11:43, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

::* Keep. @Sadko is right ngl 14:16, 13 January 2015

::NovaExplorer37 (talk) 13:16, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Beeblebrox ^Beebletalks 02:50, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: Relisting. We are looking for souces that provide SIGCOV, that's what Keep arguments need to show. Would a Redirect be an acceptable ATD?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:08, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

• Redirect per above (more useful than deleting, in my opinion). Strong oppose keeping as none of the keep votes have provided a legitimate rationale. — Anonymous 05:28, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

:Keep. The fact that the original poster is ignorant of the existence or significance of the album in a language he is ignorant of so he can't understand the listed sources about an album that went DIAMOND - is not an argument nor reason for deletion of a perfectly functional article. In fact, it is elitist, privileged and borderline racist. Hint: English is NOT the only language on the planet nor is English speaking world be-all end-all of culture and history. E.g. Original poster maintains a whole list of articles about people who, were they Nigerian instead of British, would be considered non-notable - the tenth Chief Medical Officer of the Home Office of the United Kingdom is not even a pop-quiz question, it is dust in an archive. But he was British, so it is notable. Were he from Yugoslavia the article would already be deleted. 109.175.105.19 (talk) 23:37, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

::It's unfortunately true that the English Wikipedia has a systemic bias in favor of North American or Western European subjects, but reliable sources are not optional.

::That being said, you raise a good point about music certification, specifically criteria 2 and 3 in WP:NALBUM. Can you point to one reliable source, as defined in WP:Reliable sources, that states that the album appeared in a country's national music chart and/or it received a gold or higher certification? If so, I might switch to a keep or a merge to Zana (band) per WP:NALBUM: {{tpq|Notability aside, a standalone article is only appropriate when there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged into the artist's article or discography.}}

::I'll also leave a separate message on your talk page that's not related to the article. --Richard Yin (talk) 02:12, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

::On another note, are you aware that Wikipedia has projects in hundreds of languages, some of which have different standards for notability than the English Wikipedia? Perhaps you could focus your efforts on improving them. — Anonymous 04:03, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

• Comment This above comment a non !vote since it doesn't address policy. There isn't a single reference presented here per WP:THREE to prove its notable. Its should be deleted. scope_creep^Talk 00:48, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.