Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dokya

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn by nominator‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 00:12, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

=[[:Dokya]]=

:{{la|1=Dokya}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Dokya}})

A three-sentence article about a local bookseller created in 2006 without a single source.

I don't think this business is that big and notable, it is not mentioned in local reviews ([https://www.thaiwebsites.com/bookstores.asp], [https://theculturetrip.com/asia/thailand/articles/10-must-visit-bookstores-in-bangkok-thailand/]) MartinPict (talk) 13:59, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

Update: After the changes to the page, I would like to withdraw the nomination. MartinPict (talk) 14:53, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Thailand. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:03, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

Keep. Oldest and largest nationwide bookstore chain Thailand in the 1990s, whose fall has been the subject of many business case studies. The attempt at ascertaining their business footprint from present-day reviews is commendable, but misguided in this case as the subject is mainly of historical interest, as seen in this Bangkok Post article.[https://www.bangkokpost.com/business/1120145/ailing-dokya-down-to-two-bookstores] Thai sources are easily found enough.[https://www.pptvhd36.com/news/%E0%B8%9B%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%B0%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%94%E0%B9%87%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%A3%E0%B9%89%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%99/71283][https://www.google.com/books/edition/Thun_watthanatham/oObrAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%E0%B8%A3%E0%B9%89%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%AB%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%B1%E0%B8%87%E0%B8%AA%E0%B8%B7%E0%B8%AD+%E0%B8%94%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%81%E0%B8%AB%E0%B8%8D%E0%B9%89%E0%B8%B2&dq=%E0%B8%A3%E0%B9%89%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%AB%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%B1%E0%B8%87%E0%B8%AA%E0%B8%B7%E0%B8%AD+%E0%B8%94%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%81%E0%B8%AB%E0%B8%8D%E0%B9%89%E0%B8%B2&printsec=frontcover][https://www.google.com/books/edition/%E0%B8%9B%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%B0%E0%B8%A7%E0%B8%B1%E0%B8%95%E0%B8%B4%E0%B8%A8%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%AA%E0%B8%95%E0%B8%A3%E0%B9%8C/RszgAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%E0%B8%A3%E0%B9%89%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%AB%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%B1%E0%B8%87%E0%B8%AA%E0%B8%B7%E0%B8%AD+%E0%B8%94%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%81%E0%B8%AB%E0%B8%8D%E0%B9%89%E0%B8%B2&dq=%E0%B8%A3%E0%B9%89%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%AB%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%B1%E0%B8%87%E0%B8%AA%E0%B8%B7%E0%B8%AD+%E0%B8%94%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%81%E0%B8%AB%E0%B8%8D%E0%B9%89%E0%B8%B2&printsec=frontcover] --Paul_012 (talk) 07:34, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
Comment: Article has been rewritten. MartinPict, please see if your position still stands. --Paul_012 (talk) 13:03, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
:@Paul 012, now I have nothing against keeping the page. MartinPict (talk) 14:51, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.