Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doll Graveyard

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Keep, sourced, notable, this seems to be a BF nom. Tawker 04:36, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

=[[Doll Graveyard]]=

{{ns:0|{{{cat}}}}}

:{{la|Doll Graveyard}}

:View single debate

completely insignificant, fails inclusion standards. Poorly written amatuerish fluff about a non-notable story. Rubbish article about a rubbish film. Mr Bullockx 03:31, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Keep seems notable enough. May not be a blockbuster, but it's not a student film, either. Sounds like nom's issues are more about content than about inclusion. -- Vary | Talk 04:00, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Keep per above. Its a B-grade film, sure, but that the article can be cleaned up. Viridae ^Talk 04:02, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
(conflict of interest note: I am currently trying to sort out a dispute between the nominator and the articles creator - possible bad faith nom.) Viridae ^Talk 04:02, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Comment that would explain why the editor nominated this article for deletion on his fourth edit. I was wondering. -- Vary | Talk 04:07, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Speedy close and keep Bad faith nom aside, notability claims are horse proverbial. Google [http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&newwindow=1&safe=off&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-GB%3Aofficial&hs=eYN&q=%22DOLL+GRAVEYARD%22+MOVIE&btnG=Search 14,000 for "doll graveyard" movie], reviews at msn.com[http://movies.msn.com/movies/movie.aspx?m=1819161], yahoo.com[http://movies.yahoo.com/movie/1808728794/info], rottontomatoes.com[http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/doll_graveyard/], cduniverse[http://www.cduniverse.com/productinfo.asp?pid=6982100], NY Times[http://movies2.nytimes.com/gst/movies/movie.html?v_id=335875] plus 13,990 or so others. Crazy nom Glen 04:13, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

(edit conflict)*Keep and expand, while movie has a whopping 4 reviews on www.rottentomatoes.com, it does have a New York Times review [http://movies2.nytimes.com/gst/movies/movie.html?v_id=335875].B.Wind 04:17, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

:Keep: destined to be the next cult classic Bastiq▼e ^demandez 04:32, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.