Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don Shirley (diver)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Deletes have it, and there are serious 1E concerns here as well. In the end, though, lack of sources point to deletion. Drmies (talk) 02:00, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

=[[Don Shirley (diver)]]=

:{{la|Don Shirley (diver)}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Don_Shirley_(diver) Stats])

:({{Find sources|Don Shirley (diver)}})

Lack of notability; reliable sources and bias nature of article. PoseidonDiver (talk) 20:04, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Delete - based on reasons stated above. Second most important character in non fictional book not adequate to establish notability. Only one source provided. PoseidonDiver (talk) 20:08, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 16:08, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 16:08, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Merge and redirect to David Shaw (diver), which is where the notability is. Stuartyeates (talk) 21:09, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:12, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 19:03, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Delete, no independent notability and not relevant enough to the article on David Shaw (diver) for a merger. Huon (talk) 23:09, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:07, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 November 13. Snotbot t • c » 16:45, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.