Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donghia

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 05:42, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

=[[Donghia]]=

:{{la|Donghia}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Donghia}})

Not notable, not MOS, image does not exist, does not indicate notability. Jasper Deng (talk) 05:23, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Begruding keep. Orignal article was a blatantly promotional one (written by a user names "LuxuryMarket") and the sources used in the story are pretty feeble. However, a GNews search for Donghia furniture turns up a good number of articles primarily about the company from The New York Times, so this article is fixable. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 08:28, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

:*This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 11:44, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:01, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Keep A notable furniture company covered consistently in the New York Times for 40 years. Here's one recent item [http://www.nytimes.com/indexes/2009/05/31/style/t/index.html#pageName=31donghia] that's not behind a pay wall (most are). Google Books also shows in-depth discussion in several books about interior design. Cullen328 (talk) 23:53, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.