Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dooqu
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 12:45, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
=[[Dooqu]]=
:{{la|Dooqu}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|Dooqu}})
WP:BLP, sourced exclusively to social networking platforms with not a shred of reliable source coverage shown, of a musician with no strong claim to passing WP:NMUSIC. As always, a musician is not automatically entitled to a Wikipedia article just because his own presence on Soundcloud and Facebook verifies that he exists -- he must be the subject of media coverage to earn one. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 16:28, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete total lack of anything approaching a reliable source.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:49, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:06, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:06, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as not convincing any applicable notability yet, article is not currently convincing enough. SwisterTwister talk 04:57, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.