Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doreen Rosenstrauch
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:05, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
=[[:Doreen Rosenstrauch]]=
:{{la|Doreen Rosenstrauch}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|Doreen Rosenstrauch}})
I'm unable to locate enough independent coverage of this subject to meet WP:GNG. Much of this entry details things that we don't generally consider significant for WP:PROF purposes. She got some funding for cardiovascular research but I don't think her citation record gets her to notability; she chaired one scientific session for an international conference; she has a consulting company but there's no significant coverage of it; and she was made a Fellow of the American Heart Association but that seems to be less of a distinction than fellowship in other scientific societies. As always, I'm happy to withdraw if more can be turned up. EricEnfermero (Talk) 04:29, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. EricEnfermero (Talk) 04:36, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete (provisional). Tiny GS citations for a very highly cited field gives doubts about WP:Prof. Xxanthippe (talk) 04:52, 19 September 2017 (UTC).
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:46, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:46, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:46, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:46, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:46, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom Fails WP:PROF and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 15:17, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete totally fails the notability guidelines for academics.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:05, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Consider publications as well as citations and re-evaluate Jesse Russell et al., 2013 Transmedia, Bookvika publishing, Paperback, “Doreen Rosenstrauch“, Pages:164, SUPC: SDL444291104, ISBN: 9785510954982
ISBN 9785510954982 - Doreen Rosenstrauch Direct Textbook