Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Double Wonderful

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:54, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

=[[Double Wonderful]]=

:{{la|Double Wonderful}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Double Wonderful}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{findsources|Double Wonderful}})

can't find anything notable Alan - talk 21:36, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Delete per WP:N. No evidence of notability. Alzarian16 (talk) 22:44, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Delete One trivial [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22john+swartzwelder%22+%2B+%22double+wonderful%22&btnG=Search+Archives&num=100&hl=en&ned=us&scoring=a G News] result, and one wiki site (TV.com), I'm only finding trivial coverage on a regular [http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q=%22john+swartzwelder%22+%2B++%22double+wonderful%22&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai= G search]. CTJF83 chat 19:50, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.