Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Douchemark

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy close - incorrect venue. All three nominated articles are redirects. If you wish to pursue this deletion, please relist at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion. Non-admin close. Redfarmer (talk) 05:42, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

=[[Douchemark]]=

:{{la|Douchemark}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Douchemark Stats])

:({{Find sources|Douchemark}})

Flagrant,vandalistic,spam, not notable, etc. HowardStrong (talk) 05:27, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

I've included Autism Kroner and Dunning-Krugerrand into this deletion nomination. They are both inflammotory and useless.--HowardStrong (talk) 05:35, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.