Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doug Hanks

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 02:32, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

=[[Doug Hanks]]=

:{{la|Doug Hanks}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doug Hanks}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{findsources|Doug Hanks}})

Failed wannabe politician who withdrew from a city council race when it was found out that he was a regular poster on a racist website. Was covered, for a short period of time, by the local media and a generic AP story. Really nothing more than a case of WP:BLP1E because his climbing a flagpole is even less of an event than his failed candidacy. Article was declined for speedy once and then a prod was removed because there was supposedly discussion about a merge, but the discussion never happened. Original author appears to be blocked for socking. Niteshift36 (talk) 04:37, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Delete We usually say that an ordinary criminal is not notable. This guy didn't even raise to that level. No evidence that he had or has any influence on anyone else, or on events. Steve Dufour (talk) 07:12, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
Delete non notable, references cited fail WP:POLITICIAN and WP:GNG Valenciano (talk) 01:07, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:15, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:16, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
Delete A person that run for a brief time for a seat in a city council is not notable.User:Lucifero4
Delete as a one news cycle local politician. Bearian (talk) 04:29, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Most losing candidates for local political offices are non-notable. All of the subject's notability appears connected to that single race. Will Beback talk 21:07, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
Delete rather non-notable. JBsupreme (talk) 17:28, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.