Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doug Underhill

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Doug Underhill}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Doug Underhill}})

Fails NPOL and does not have required inline citations. Already exists as draft, so cleanest solution is to delete this one and let the draft improve if references can be found. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 18:30, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:39, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:39, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

• Delete - This article does not speak for itself as to how the subject satisfies general notability. The draft has been declined and may be left in place. May be conflict of interest editing. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:49, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
• Delete - currently does not meet WP:NPOL. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 04:08, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
• Delete. County board of commissioners is not a level of office that guarantees automatic passage of WP:NPOL — for a county commissioner to be notable enough for a Wikipedia article, he needs to demonstrate a strongly credible and well-sourced reason why he should be deemed a special case of significantly greater notability than most other county commissioners, but this article is failing to do that. The existence of a small handful of local election coverage in the local media and some election results tables on the county website is not sufficient to claim that a county commissioner has cleared that bar, either, because every county commissioner in every county can always show that. Bearcat (talk) 19:54, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.