Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doug Williams (visual artist)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:14, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

=[[Doug Williams (visual artist)]]=

:{{la|Doug Williams (visual artist)}} ([{{fullurl:Doug Williams (visual artist)|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doug Williams (visual artist)}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Procedural AfD - This article was originally deleted as an uncontested PROD. Per a [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:J.delanoy&diff=292362926&oldid=292331401 request] on my talk page, I have undeleted the article to send to AfD.

The original PROD rationale was:

:''Lacks notability. Career seems to consist of one World Record which could probably be listed elsewhere on wiki...such as Chest hair.

This tag was endorsed by another editor, who added:

:''would seem to be a classic WP:BLP1E candidate

I personally do not have a definite opinion one way or another, which is why I sent this here. J.delanoygabsadds 03:53, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

  • Delete. WP:ONEEVENT Drawn Some (talk) 12:05, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete - I was the prod2. The article claims he is a "visual artist, director, and writer," which is probably all true. However, the only thing he is actually known for is "having the world's longest nipple hair." Simply put, that is not enough for an article IMO. --ThaddeusB (talk) 18:53, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete -I agree ^^^^^^^.OtisJimmyOne 20:07, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:BLP1E, single event not persistent in reliable secondary sources. Dreadstar † 17:04, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete. Worth a chuckle, perhaps... but not notable. - JeffJonez (talk) 21:49, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.