Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dozy Vs. Drake - Upon Further Consideration

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep Nomination withdrawn by candidate. Non admin closure. Wisdom89 _{(_T / ^C)} 20:49, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

=[[Dozy Vs. Drake - Upon Further Consideration]]=

:{{la|Dozy Vs. Drake - Upon Further Consideration}} ([{{fullurl:Dozy Vs. Drake - Upon Further Consideration|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dozy Vs. Drake - Upon Further Consideration}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

~~NN single released on CD-R by an indie band, fails WP:MUSIC. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 02:08, 12 March 2008 (UTC)~~

:Keep - Thanks for catching my error, that was supposed to be in CD5 format, not CDR. The band is notable, and this was an official release on Revival Records. All Music Guide has published coverage on this single ([http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=11:39ftxqljldje here]), as well as Trouser Press Magazine ([http://www.trouserpress.com/entry.php?a=spoon2 here]); therefore, this release is notable enough to keep according to WP:MUSIC.(Fulmerg (talk) 03:52, 12 March 2008 (UTC))

::Okay, I listed for AfD mostly based on the CD-R release, since that usually wouldn't fulfill WP:MUSIC. Since that was a typo, and the sources you added show independent coverage, I will withdraw the AfD. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 20:13, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Wisdom89 _{(_T / ^C)} 06:39, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
Keep - All I needed to see was allmusicguide. Meets WP:MUSIC. Wisdom89 _{(_T / ^C)} 06:41, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
Keep per the above; subject is sourceable, and appears to have some notability. UltraExactZZ ^Claims~ Evidence 12:58, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.