Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr.Mohammad Reza Marvi Mohajer

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. DGG's well-argued point not withstanding, the consensus here is to delete (although it is noted that several were 'weak delete's) -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 10:15, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

=[[Dr.Mohammad Reza Marvi Mohajer]]=

:{{la|Dr.Mohammad Reza Marvi Mohajer}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr.Mohammad Reza Marvi Mohajer}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{Find sources|Dr.Mohammad Reza Marvi Mohajer}})

Non-notable professor. No indications that this person's work has made a significant impact in his field. No indications of any special notice from his academic community, such as awards or indendent coverage. Also, Wikipedia is not a place to post one's resume. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:08, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:10, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:11, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:11, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
  • I moved the page to Mohammad Reza Marvi Mohajer is accordance with the MOS. DGG ( talk ) 03:33, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep Reading the article slowly, he seems to be notable as a academic/technical administrator, He also may be notable as a scholar--he held visiting professorships at major universities in Germany & Switzerland, and has written a number of books that have been translated into other languages. I interpret "58 persian projects, 32 projects in other languages" to mean 58 papers in Persian and 32 in other languages. Given the 12 doctorates he has directed, he is a leading figure in his subject, at least in his country. And the inability to be more precise is a function of systematic bias in lack of indexing coverage. DGG ( talk ) 03:33, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
  • Weak delete. It all looks impressive, but I cannot verify from the sources provided that he has made a significant impact in his field. Location (talk) 06:13, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
  • Weak delete He has published a few articles, see [http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=%22Mohammad+Reza+Marvi+Mohajer%22&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0 Google Scholar], but his articles are rarely cited by others in the field. That would suggest that he fails WP:ACADEMIC ( a guideline which has very high criteria compared to guidelines in other fields such as sports). He is described as a "faculty member" at Tehran University, which is a distinguished university; I wonder if he is a tenured professor? If so that could almost be enough to make him notable, but I'm not able to find out that information. BTW if the article is kept, the "Dr." needs to be removed from the title per Wikipedia style. --MelanieN (talk) 15:29, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:11, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

  • Weak delete I formatted the article a bit to make more easily readable. It is a nice resume, but so far does not quite appear to satisfy WP:ACADEMIC. Edison (talk) 20:52, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
  • Weak delete - No indication meets WP:ACADEMIC - if new sources come to light might change mind. Codf1977 (talk) 11:38, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
  • Delete in the absence of any actual evidence that he passes WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:55, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.