Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Draupati Amman Temples, Kumbakonam
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Bungle (talk • contribs) 17:41, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
=[[:Draupati Amman Temples, Kumbakonam]]=
:{{la|Draupati Amman Temples, Kumbakonam}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Draupati Amman Temples, Kumbakonam}})
These new temples seem to be minor shrines. The references are new articles in Dinamani newspaper about their establishment. No wide coverage Redtigerxyz Talk 13:42, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. Redtigerxyz Talk 13:42, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Redtigerxyz Talk 13:42, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:51, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. Multiple in-depth references. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:41, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: At least three of the temples aren't new; they're a part of historical South India. This book (published in 1915) has an image of Aravan and Durga at one of them: [https://www.google.com/books/edition/Southern_India_Its_History_People_Commer/Q4xEAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=Draupadi+Amman+Temples,+Kumbakonam&pg=PA442&printsec=frontcover]. I couldn't find anything additional for the temple at Mathakdadi Street, but I did find a book reference for the one at Hajiyar/Hajiar Street: [https://www.google.com/books/edition/Freud_s_Mahabharata/4hhnDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=Hajiyar+street+temple+kumbakonam&pg=PA154&printsec=frontcover]. Given this, the sources already cited, that these temples have been dedicated to the notable Draupati Amman and that Chakrapani and Sarangapani already have their own pages with sources, this passes WP:NBUILD for the collective's social and historic notability. Heartmusic678 (talk) 14:40, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, as they pass WP:NBUILDJackattack1597 (talk) 11:16, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.