Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dreams for Kids
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 04:27, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
=[[Dreams for Kids]]=
:{{la|Dreams for Kids}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|Dreams for Kids}})
This article only superficially has a lot of sources. The sources are all very low-quality, and some, I suspect, don't even mention the organization. The article was probably written a marketing company, see Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard/Archive 79#SavvyMedia Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:19, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:12, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:13, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:13, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - lousy sourcing from trivial sources; actual hard evidence of notability for this local charity is simply lacking. Being written by a paid spammer is not the kiss of death, but it does usually mean (as here) low quality of writing and sources alike, in a Wikipedia context. --Orange Mike | Talk 00:47, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails WP:GNG, references are either from the subject's website or of poor reliability/depth of coverage.Becky Sayles (talk) 06:28, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.