Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dreamweavers

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Dreamweaver (disambiguation). MBisanz talk 01:52, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

=[[Dreamweavers]]=

:{{la|Dreamweavers}} ([{{fullurl:Dreamweavers|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dreamweavers}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

This fictional group does not establish notability independent of Age of the Five through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so extended coverage is unnecessary. TTN (talk) 03:27, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

  • Comment not that I defend this article, but the nomination does not seem to match the article. Far from unnecessary plot details, there is not even the minimum of plot information whatever to give any idea of what's going on or any but the vaguest impression of what role the figures might have. 04:22, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
  • I was notified about this deletion request because the requestor saw me listed as creator. In fact, I did not create the article in place now; I had made a redirect page under that title to The Dream Weavers. If you do delete this article, I wish to have the redirect page that I originally put there restored. -- BRG (talk) 18:28, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
  • improve, merge, redirect. Content should be saved for a rewrite. -- Mvuijlst (talk) 21:50, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete and redirct to the dab page Dreamweaver (disambiguation). There don't appear to even be articles on the books, if so why should element of the books have articles? 76.66.195.159 (talk) 06:28, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete Does not establish notability through significant coverage of real world context in reliable secondary sources independent of the subject. Merging will not result in real world context, so that doesn't solve the problem. Plot details that don't support real world context are unnecessary. Jay32183 (talk) 23:07, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete and I agree about the above point for the dab. Eusebeus (talk) 00:04, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.