Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drew Blake

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Came across this whilst patrolling CSD and agree it meets A7. Closing this as a delete decision. Basalisk inspect damage⁄berate 09:52, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

=[[Drew Blake]]=

:{{la|Drew Blake}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Drew_Blake Stats])

:({{Find sources|Drew Blake}})

Maybe I am not looking hard enough, but I cannot find any WP:RS to support the WP:GNG of this article. There are 2 books that I can find on Amazon.com, but this simply shows he is an author (or pen name) and does not establish notability. Subject fails both WP:GNG and WP:AUTHOR. FoolMeOnce2Times (talk) 01:51, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

:* Delete Unsourced BLP, no evidence of notability. I flagged the article Engineer's Spell for deletion a couple of years ago, and this has brought it back to my attention, and I think it also deserves an afd. (Done.) Despite WP:AGF I suspect self-publicity in both articles. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 09:01, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:05, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:05, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

  • Delete probably by speedy A7 Neither the author nor any of his books is even in worldcat. Apparently self-published, and writing self published books is not a plausible claim to notability . DGG ( talk ) 02:26, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
  • Delete. I'll try tagging it as an A7 due to the books only being self-published, but I don't know if it'd qualify under that. In any case, this is a clear cut case of no notability. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:39, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.