Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drew Roy

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:24, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

=[[Drew Roy]]=

:{{la|Drew Roy}} ([{{fullurl:Drew Roy|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drew Roy}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Essentially an unsourced BLP. The only sources given are IMDb (for a cast listing) and the subject's Myspace page. No substantial coverage in independent reliable sources provided or found. Five film credits listed, all in non-notable productions. Three single episode TV roles. One recurring role, said to be notable, but listed as "uncredited". SummerPhD (talk) 01:28, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Delete I wish that proposal to make an unsourced BLP a criteria for speedy deletion was sucessful, no reliable coverage, couldn't find anything either. - 2 ... says you, says me 01:33, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete Insufficient notability to meet guidelines. ChildofMidnight (talk) 03:16, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete Fails WP:ENTERTAINER Pinkadelica ^♣ 06:52, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:03, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:03, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete besides the obvious, poorly written and format needs cleaning up; he appears to be a young actor at the start of his career. Locking down numerous of credits in 2009 shows significant growth in career. However, most all movies are extremely low budget films and includes a short; based on billing, he has 1 lead and other supporting or minor. For now I would recommend deletion.--BioDetective2508 (talk) 18:40, 29 June 2009

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.