Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drizzt Do'Urden's scimitars

:{{la|Drizzt Do'Urden's scimitars}} – (View AfD)(View log)

Non-notable fictional weapons. These are just props in a series of books and some games, and there isn't enough out-of-universe, third-party reference material to build a sustainable Wikipedia article.

{{tl|prod}} and {{tl|prod2}} removed by User: with the comment "remove prod, these are notable fictional weapons by wiki standards". I can't find any Wikipedia standard for fictional weapons. Mikeblas 09:00, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

• Delete as these fictional weapons have no reliable secondary sources to demonstrate notability outside of [http://www.wizards.com/dnd/article.asp?x=fr/fx20010117d Forgotten Realms Campaign Setting] in which they endow players with 2-3 points if they possess them. --Gavin Collins 11:03, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
• Merge any useful content to Drizzt Do'Urden (where the weapons are already mentioned). BLACKKITE 11:32, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
• Merge per BLACKKITE; no need for AfD, just be WP:BOLD. Makes sense to just put it where it is most likely to be sought; in this case in article Drizzt Do'Urden. ◄Zahakiel► 16:59, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
• Merge as per Black Kite. Edward321 (talk) 04:45, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
• Merge (and copyedit for brevity) - to Drizzt Do'Urden, these swords are not Stormbringer or Exicalibur. Web Warlock (talk) 18:45, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, cruftastic expansion of something which already has enough detail on the parent article. Chris Cunningham (talk) 17:39, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
• Merge as per Black Kite. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 15:09, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Far too much coverage for a non-notable thing. Mbisanz (talk) 15:48, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.