Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drug Dealers Anonymous

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) st170e^talk 01:23, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

=[[:Drug Dealers Anonymous]]=

:{{la|Drug Dealers Anonymous}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Drug_Dealers_Anonymous Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Drug Dealers Anonymous}})

Not notable Rathfelder (talk) 22:33, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Keep- A great song and meets WP:NSONG. A Google search turns up loads of articles and reviews including [http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/hear-pusha-t-jay-z-confess-on-drug-dealers-anonymous-20160531 Rolling Stone], [http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/06/01/jay-z-s-drug-dealers-anonymous-how-true-are-the-rapper-s-drug-dealing-claims.html Daily Beast], [http://pitchfork.com/news/65851-pusha-t-and-jay-z-team-up-on-new-track-drug-dealers-anonymous-listen/ Pitchfork], [http://www.complex.com/music/2016/05/pusha-t-jay-z-drug-dealers-anonymous-new-song Complex], [http://www.vibe.com/2016/06/tomi-lahren-now-wants-to-make-a-remix-to-drug-dealers-anonymous/ Vibe], and [http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/music/jay-z-hits-back-tomi-lahren-track-drug-dealers-anonymous-article-1.2656502 NY Daily News]. Bzweebl (talk • contribs) 06:58, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Someone needs to add references to the article then.Rathfelder (talk) 12:31, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:11, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:12, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Keep and encourage User:Bzweebl to add the references to the article. Notability tests whether there are WP:RS, not whether those sources are currently in the article. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 01:54, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Keep. Writeups in reliable sources are enough for notability. agtx 15:06, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.