Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dub punk

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:27, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

=[[Dub punk]]=

:{{la|Dub punk}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Dub_punk Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Dub punk}})

Fails WP:GNG, WP:Band. Also concerns of promo & COI based on WP:SPA. I can't find any reliable secondary sources. CSD challenged so will post AfD to allow broad consensus to evolve. Gaff (talk) 00:56, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:50, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:18, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|96%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (notify) @ 13:11, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Delete per nom. Completely non-notable – I think a whopping [https://soundcloud.com/dub-punk 15 followers on Soundcloud] says it all. IgnorantArmies (talk) 13:49, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Earflaps (talk) 16:06, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Delete per everyone above - Non notable band. –Davey2010^Talk 17:25, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.