Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duncan Denholm

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Lear's Fool 10:37, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

=[[Duncan Denholm]]=

:{{la|Duncan Denholm}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Duncan Denholm}})

Zero RS gnews hits, zero RS gbooks hits. Epeefleche (talk) 01:21, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. My own Google News archives search turned up with no coverage at all. [http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=%22duncan+denholm%22&hl=en&tbm=nws&prmd=imvnso&source=lnt&tbs=ar:1&sa=X&ei=eVAjT8yKCuONiAeWvfnwCA&ved=0CBMQpwUoBQ&biw=1280&bih=707] Till I Go Home (talk) 01:35, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:25, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Golf-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:25, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:26, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Der yck C. 12:18, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Delete A pro golfer should have attracted at least some coverage in the news, even just locally. However the [http://trove.nla.gov.au/ National Library of Australia's archives] return nothing for any of the varied searches I've tried. Fails WP:GNG and doesn't appear to pass any of the criteria at WP:NGOLF. Yunshui 雲‍水 13:07, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Weak Delete I did find a section on him in a book of Australian golfers, but that's pretty much it - not enough for notability. Given that he died over 40 years ago, there may be older stuff that we are missing - I could be persuaded to change my vote if more sources were found. Nwlaw63 (talk) 20:41, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.