Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duran Bell

:{{la|Duran Bell}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Duran Bell}})

No reliable secondary sources to establish notability. 1st source self, 2nd and 3rd are faculty directories. aprock (talk) 05:04, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

• Keep I'm the creator of the article. Bell is well known in his particular field and is a former tenured full professor at a major university. A quick [http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Duran_Bell Google scholar search] also shows that his work is well cited by others in the field. I believe he passes criteria 1 and 5 in WP:Scholar. LK (talk) 05:09, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 05:16, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

• keep—did nominator read WP:BEFORE and/or WP:PROF, i wonder, given this slough of ill-justified nominations of academics? this one has a gscholar h-index of at least 20, so his work is quite well cited indeed.— alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 05:23, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
• Keep It is the available sourcing, not the sourcing in the article right this minute, that matters. Likely meets the GNG (as well as WP:PROF, but I don't like SNGs). Protonk (talk) 06:23, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
• Keep per LK and others -- former tenured full professor at a major university. Johnfos (talk) 03:24, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

• Relisted this AFD because it was originally closed as a "Speedy Keep", which clearly didn't apply.—Kww(talk) 03:02, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:58, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.