Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duran Music Entertainment

:{{la|Duran Music Entertainment}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Duran_Music_Entertainment Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Duran Music Entertainment}})

DePRODed by COI creator without addressing the issues. Concern was: Cursory search shows no evidence of coverage in secondary sources, fails WP:CORP and WP:GNG Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:03, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

• Delete - I continue to believe that WP:CORP does not fit record labels well at all, and have tried (and failed) to establish notability criteria for this set of articles. However, by any standard this is a non-notable entity. There is no length of operation, there is no roster of notable artists, there is no indication the label has had any impact on any musical genre or on any cultural set or subset. My searches resulted in no reliable sources whatsoever. The single "blue-link" appears to be a non-notable artist created as part of a walled garden. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 14:27, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:18, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:18, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:18, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:18, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

• Delete - pretty blatantly promotional in the face of lack of notability. I also had to delete the empty category they created for their artists - David Gerard (talk) 18:05, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
• The username also gets a block as a role account. Also, they've been creating and recreating A7 on the label's artists, so it was a promotional spam block - David Gerard (talk) 18:12, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
• Delete as still nothing close to actually establishing substance for independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 22:48, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.