Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dzok Trun Trun
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 15:21, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
=[[Dzok Trun Trun]]=
:{{la|Dzok Trun Trun}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|Dzok Trun Trun}})
Hoax, most probably. The image included in this article was of an owner of an ice cream shop. The first reference appears to be to a site focusing on the Dalai Lama; hardly likely to be relevant. The second and third are dead links, I cannot verify what they said. The last one has been [http://web.archive.org/web/20110808201008/http://www.bhutanstudies.org.bt/pubFiles/tertonsherabmebar.pdf preserved by the Internet Archive]; while I cannot read it, the file metadata say "Terton Sherab Bar's Biography with CONTENT.". Neither of the two existing sources contains the supposed name of this person spelled in Dzongkha ("བོ་ཡིག་ག། །མ་རྫོང").
You should [http://wikipediocracy.com/2015/04/05/bhutanese-passport-what-does-the-hoax-say/ thank Wikipediocracy] for discovering this. — Keφr 13:37, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:02, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:02, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:02, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete Blatant Hoax. Bosstopher (talk) 23:40, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - per nom, unclear notability, references do not support content, probable hoax.Dialectric (talk) 00:24, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete – From the author's edit history and user page (implausible), the Wikipediocracy article, the English (too good), his familiarity with editing, and the content of the article, it certainly looks like a hoax. – Margin1522 (talk) 18:22, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
:Delete: Hoax. The name given is "བོ་ཡིག་ག། །མ་རྫོང", which is Boyik Gama dzong. Ogress smash! 05:59, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.