Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EBillingHub
=[[EBillingHub]]=
:{{la|EBillingHub}} ([{{fullurl:EBillingHub|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EBillingHub}}&action=delete}} delete]) –
I declined a WP:CSD#G11 speedy request on this one, as it seems right on the borderline. Probably posted by an affiliate of the company, and no evidence of WP:Notability. Aervanath (talk) 21:02, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
- CSD as copyvio [http://www.aderant.com/products/product_detail.aspx?id=29&categoryID=2] ninety:one 21:04, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
- Not wholly a copyvio of that, though. The copyvio material can probably be removed.--Aervanath (talk) 21:19, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 23:14, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. No assertion of notability. Looks like an ad. Niteshift36 (talk) 02:38, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.