Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EBillity

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 13:49, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

=[[EBillity]]=

:{{la|EBillity}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/EBillity Stats])

:({{Find sources|EBillity}})

Non notable software . The 3rd party references aren't about the software, but rather that it is one of the products Intuit recommended when it dropped one of its own products. DGG ( talk ) 01:42, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:25, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:25, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:25, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete - software company article lacking significant independent coverage to establish notability - sources used in article have only incidental mentions of the software of a sentence or two; a search turned up no significant RS coverage; created by an SPA as possibly promotional.Dialectric (talk) 01:36, 27 April 2014 (UTC)


:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar  04:29, 1 May 2014 (UTC)


:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.