Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ECircle
=[[ECircle]]=
:{{la|ECircle}} – (
:({{Find sources|ECircle}})
advertisement The Banner talk 19:37, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
Keep/Improve: If it was clearly just an advert with no redeeming value then it could be speedied, but it doesn't appear to meet that criteria. Just because the article is currently overly promotional is not a reason to scrap it entirely. The company seems notable, from my cursory Google searches for "Teradata ecircle" and "ecircle news -teradata":
- http://www.informationweek.com/software/business-intelligence/teradata-acquires-ecircle-for-social-mob/232901345
- http://www.decisionmarketing.co.uk/news/teradata-ecircle-buy-woos-marketers
- http://www.mediaweek.co.uk/news/884278/
- http://www.mediaweek.co.uk/news/901971/
- http://www.brandrepublic.com/news/977582/Private-equity-investment-primes-eCircle-expansion/
- http://techcrunch.com/2010/01/11/ta-associates-buys-60-million-stake-in-european-email-marketing-leader-ecircle/
- http://www.nmk.co.uk/article/2012/6/25/the-key-to-email-marketing-success-interview-with-ecircle
- http://www.citmagazine.com/article/1124406/corporate-profile-lucy-hudson-ecircle
- http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Massive-technische-Probleme-bei-eCircle-35258.html
- http://www.silicon.de/41585742/teradata-marketing-chefs-bekommen-bald-grosere-it-budgets-als-cios/
::-- Brainy J ~✿~ (talk) 20:55, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:10, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:10, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:10, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:10, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
- Keep needs work of course to salvage the article. I might have some time to start that today.... W Nowicki (talk) 19:03, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.