Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ENGENEER

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:40, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

=[[ENGENEER]]=

:{{la|ENGENEER}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/ENGENEER Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|ENGENEER}})

I'm not tagging this for speedy deletion due to credible claims to notability. However, a search for reliable coverage failed to find much of use. It does not help that his stage name is a surprisingly common misspelling for engineer, so false positives abounded. Still, even with more specific searches, reliable coverage was found to be lacking. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 11:40, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 11:41, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 11:41, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 11:41, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 11:41, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 11:41, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Delete - Fails WP:GNG for lack of available sources.- Mr X 12:03, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Delete - In addition I didn't find any reliable sources in Hebrew. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 12:05, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Delete - Not only is there a lack of reliable sources for the article to be considered notable, but without reliable sources it is impossible to meet WP:BLPSOURCES policy. Concerning the misspelling of Engineer, I suggest that if this article is deleted a redirect to engineer should be put in it's place as a likely misspelling. -- FactualCollector7d1 (talk) 06:26, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.