Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EXIT (magazine)
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:EXIT (magazine)}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EXIT (magazine)}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:EXIT (magazine)}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. Liz Read! Talk! 08:53, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
=[[:EXIT (magazine)]]=
:{{la|1=EXIT (magazine)}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=EXIT (magazine)}})
Maybe someone else can find enough reliable sources, but I couldn't. Pretty obvious COI creation. Doug Weller talk 09:49, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Comics and animation, Companies, and New York. Skynxnex (talk) 13:54, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete I suspect the involvement of the magazine's editor, G Petros, in the creation of this article. Call it a nagging feeling, a 'hunch' if you will. Fails WP:GNG, unsourced OR. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 14:09, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.