Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EXOFS

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 00:18, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

=[[EXOFS]]=

:{{la|EXOFS}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|EXOFS}})

Inclusion does not equal notability. Unable to locate substantial coverage in secondary sources – just a paragraph [http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Kernel-Log-What-s-coming-in-2-6-30-File-systems-New-and-revamped-file-systems-741319.html here] and a bullet point [http://www.linuxfordevices.com/c/a/News/Linux-2630-gets-new-filesystems/ here]. Pnm (talk) 04:39, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

:Keep: I'm not sure what the nom is saying exactly, but on the N/V side of things there's [http://www.dtc.umn.edu/disc/resources/osdop.pdf this from IBM], [http://storageconference.org/2006/Presentations/14.pdf this presentation for DSI], and [http://www.linuxfoundation.org/news-media/lwf/filesystems this mention from the Linux Foundation]. There's also some traffic on Kernel Trap. Note the project's name changed, and that the old name is sometimes used to discuss the concept, rather than this particular implementation. Maury Markowitz (talk) 12:54, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:23, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Those are interesting sources. Do Linux Weather Forecast or Lwn.net meet WP:RS? IBM is primary. The text in DSI is so sparse that it's nearly unusable. (By the way, I meant "non-notable software.") --Pnm (talk) 04:07, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:25, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

  • Keep: per Maury - Ret.Prof (talk) 02:01, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.