Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Earth Systems

=[[Earth Systems]]=

:{{la|Earth Systems}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Earth_Systems Stats])

:({{Find sources|Earth Systems}})

Not notable and no assertion of any significant notability. No references at all . Fails WP:CORP.  Velella  Velella Talk   08:39, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

  • Comment Not an easy name to search for any relevant sources, and I haven't found any on a first couple of searches, but it may have been better to start with maintenance tags to encourage the (new user) article creator to add any available references rather than go straight to AfD? AllyD (talk) 09:01, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

:Comment reply - I did exactly as you have done and looked for refs and found none. If despite the best efforts of a new editor, the topic is unequivocally not-notable, dragging out the process over several weeks doesn't actually help anybody or Wikipedia.  Velella  Velella Talk   20:52, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:08, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:08, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.