Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Easteighteen

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:41, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

=[[Easteighteen]]=

:{{la|Easteighteen}} ([{{fullurl:Easteighteen|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Easteighteen}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Fails WP:BAND as I can't find anything to convey significance or notability. A few local reviews can be found, but they don't satisfy the "multiple, nontrivial published works" needed. Them From Space 16:39, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Them From Space 16:42, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Fails notability criteria. Niteshift36 (talk) 06:03, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete - lacks the significant coverage in reliable sources to establish notability -- Whpq (talk) 17:55, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete, per WP:MUSIC. By the way, if the article gets deleted, we'll need to delete In the Event that You're Right as well, per CSD A9.
Delete - as per nom (sorry it's as simple as that). Also delete their record article. --Triwbe (talk) 05:36, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.