Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Economy of Daltonganj (Medininagar)

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Economy of Daltonganj (Medininagar)}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Economy of Daltonganj (Medininagar)}})

While populated places are presumed notable, I don't think any and all aspects of populated places are. The salient contents (bear with me...) of this could in theory be merged into the main article on Medininagar, except that there isn't all that much to merge, once you weed out all the unsupported OR and fluff. The few sources that there are, aren't exactly RS, so this pretty much fails every aspect of notability. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:55, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:07, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:07, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

• Delete After removing some of the unsourced sections and those without any relevant sources. All that is left is one section that really should be removed as well. Absolutely nothing here worth saving. noq (talk) 17:26, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
• Delete - Daltonganj already has a section on the economy in the main article so this is a redundant fork Spiderone 18:29, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
• Merge I agree with others that this does not deserve its own article. I think the contents can be merged and redirected to Medininagar#Economy as it adds some value to the target article. The author {{re|Weareme234}} should be noticed and warned not to create such articles, at least 4 of them are on AfD right now. --Walrus Ji (talk) 18:35, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.