Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ed Minar

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Flowerparty^☀ 23:32, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

=[[Ed Minar]]=

:{{la|Ed Minar}} ([{{fullurl:Ed Minar|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ed Minar}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Prod was deprodded by a sock of a banned user doing block evasion, but I did not reprod since someone else has edited it slightly since. Am going to AFD because this person seems to fail WP:ACADEMIC criteria for an article here. DreamGuy (talk) 17:48, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Delete Fails WP:ACADEMIC. The only citation is a link to Ed Minar's personal website.Wik-e-wik (talk)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 03:23, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Fails WP:PROF. Niteshift36 (talk) 03:28, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete Not yet notable.DGG (talk) 05:22, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete Completely non-notable and no notability is suggested or asserted in article. He is an associate professor with a normal background and accomplishment level found in that sort of job. OfficeGirl (talk) 03:50, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete. No indication of sufficient academic impact to pass WP:PROF #1 is presented in the article, nor could I find any in Google scholar nor Google books, and he appears even less likely to pass any of the other WP:PROF criteria. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:43, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete Fails WP:PROF, non-notable. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 03:22, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.