Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Educational Testing and Evaluation Agency
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Educational Testing and Evaluation Agency}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Educational Testing and Evaluation Agency}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Educational Testing and Evaluation Agency}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. Star Mississippi 17:32, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
=[[:Educational Testing and Evaluation Agency]]=
:{{la|1=Educational Testing and Evaluation Agency}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Educational Testing and Evaluation Agency}})
Fails WP:GNG; specialist provincial Pakistani government agency. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 08:27, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Pakistan. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 08:27, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
:
{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:21, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
- Most of the 40 papers found by clicking on "scholar" above appear to consist of significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Many of them are studies of whether this agency's entrance tests are reliable predictors of student performance. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:44, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
:
{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:29, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.