Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Joseph Schroeter
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Nomination withdrawn until work on article is done; I intend to re-open this AFD (if appropriate) once it appears that the primary contributors have finished adding their stuff to the article, as there's still a lot being done here. (non-admin closure) Actualcpscm (talk) 20:10, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
=[[:Edward Joseph Schroeter]]=
:{{la|1=Edward Joseph Schroeter}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Edward Joseph Schroeter}})
None of the sources provided in the article meet the standards of WP:GNG or WP:BASIC; there is practically no in-depth coverage of this individual in reliable independent sources. Note that the article was created by COI editors [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ASockpuppet_investigations%2FWaltermontano&diff=1168262000&oldid=1168259529 violating] WP:MEAT. Actualcpscm (talk) 09:49, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Engineering, and New York. Actualcpscm (talk) 09:51, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
::::I continued this discussion on your talk page; I don‘t think it belongs at this AFD. Actualcpscm (talk) 12:07, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
:::For the record, I made inappropriate, intemperate comments that did not directly address the topic at hand: deletion or retention of this article. For those who need to see them, they're in this [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Edward_Joseph_Schroeter&diff=prev&oldid=1168408084 diff] and in the page history.
:::I apologize for acting this way.
:::--A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 15:44, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
:Please review the articles again and determine if there is still insufficient source material. Per WP:BASIC, academics can be notably influential in the world of ideas without their biographies being the subject of secondary sources. The source link to his co-authored patent on acoustic plaster is a significant contribution to the field of architectural acoustics and these principles are still used today. Bcudequest (talk) 20:07, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.