Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eirtakon

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:24, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

=[[Eirtakon]]=

:{{la|Eirtakon}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eirtakon}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{findsources|Eirtakon}})

Does not appear to meet any notability criteria; single source which doesn't appear to meet WP:RS. Stifle (talk) 20:24, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Delete Per nom, can only find a single source, that is the event holder itself. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 20:27, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. -- —Farix (t | c) 13:41, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
Comment: couldn't dig up much in http://www.google.com/cse?cx=009114923999563836576%3A1eorkzz2gp4&q=eirtakon . A few possibly RS blogs mention it, and ANN mentions some VA going to it. Too bad; you would think the Irish media at least would cover 'the largest con in Ireland'. --Gwern (contribs) 17:03 31 January 2010 (GMT)
@Gwern Those comics/manga RS critics & essayists blogs may be used only within their scope which doesn't include anime convention. --KrebMarkt 19:05, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
Comment: Incidentally, I'm in Ireland and have heard of the convention, and know a few people who go to it. It definitely isn't the largest con in Ireland (that's Warpcon, in all likelihood). Stifle (talk) 09:41, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Pmlineditor ∞ 12:21, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Delete The article gives no independent sources at all, and searches have failed to produce anything that could remotely be considered substantial coverage in reliable sources. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:18, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Delete completely unnotable event; fails WP:N by lacking significant coverage in third-party, reliable sources -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 23:33, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.