Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eladio Ribeiro Neto

=[[Eladio Ribeiro Neto]]=

:{{la|Eladio Ribeiro Neto}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eladio Ribeiro Neto}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{Find sources|Eladio Ribeiro Neto}})

fails each of the criteria listed WP:Notability for Sports for tennis players, unless I m mistaken Mayumashu (talk) 19:38, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

  • Comment *tilts head* The requirements for tennis notability seem to be higher than other sports. Hold on a bit, i'm going to go bring this up on the notability talk page. SilverserenC 22:14, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

:Discussion started [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(sports)#Tennis_notability_AfD_Issue here]. SilverserenC 22:19, 11 September 2010 (UTC)


:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

  • Delete as article fails notability criteria for tennis players. Armbrust Talk Contribs 02:48, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Delete – fails WP:NTENNIS and I think the discussions on the NSPORT talk page here has shown that the subject (and most others competing on the ITF) are semi-professional rather than professional and thus shouldn't have a wikipedia article. Jenks24 (talk) 15:51, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Keeep Maybe a stub but meets notability as he has won many future tournaments. KnowIG (talk) 08:53, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Comment Meets #7 for notability as he has won a futures event, in the new [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(sports)/Archive_5#for_tennis_players modified notability rules] KnowIG (talk) 09:00, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

:*Comment WP:TENNIS has only 6 criteria. The material you found on the talk page archive is not the guideline. Armbrust Talk Contribs 11:42, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

  • NOTICE: Recently deleted page recreated Mayumashu (talk) 13:47, 6 February 2011 (UTC)