Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electric Century

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mojo Hand (talk) 02:15, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

=[[Electric Century]]=

:{{la|Electric Century}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Electric_Century Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Electric Century}})

Article that was previously deleted per prod. A rock group that has no notability....yet. Now eventually it will I'm sure. Wgolf (talk) 01:54, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:51, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:51, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Keep: By the weak standards we seem to keep around here, I believe they meet General Notability Guidelines. They have two legitimate references; they've actually produced something that's been covered in the press; two of the members come from notable bands (one of them very notable) and one is notable in his own right. I agree, not very notable, yet, but notable enough. ubiquity (talk) 13:12, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

  • Speedy keep. Bringing articles to AfD should be a last resort after other alternatives have at least been considered. Even if you don't think this merits a standalone article, the obvious thing would be a merge to Mikey Way. [http://www.mtv.com/news/1722576/my-chemical-romance-mikey-way-new-band-electric-century/ This MTV article] in addition to what's already in the article probably gives the band a pass of WP:GNG/WP:NBAND. It's a keep or a merge - either way it shouldn't have been brought here. --Michig (talk) 14:39, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Comment-I thought that you bring up AFD's though when someone does delete the prod template also though. Wgolf (talk) 04:26, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.