Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electric Honey (Partland Brothers album)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to The Partland Brothers. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 02:11, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

=[[:Electric Honey (Partland Brothers album)]]=

:{{la|Electric Honey (Partland Brothers album)}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Electric_Honey_(Partland_Brothers_album) Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Electric Honey (Partland Brothers album)}})

Inadequately referenced article about an album whose strongest real notability claim is that it exists. The fact that a band may have an article about them as a band does not mean that each of their albums automatically inherits an inclusion freebie as a separate topic, but the only other real basis for notability here is that it grazed the bottoms of the album charts in Canada (#92) and the United States (#146), which are not high enough chart positions to deem the album "inherently" notable on that basis in the absence of any other evidence. The sourcing here isn't impressive, either: there's one very short blurb of an album review (which is not substantive enough to carry a WP:GNG pass all by itself), its own primary source buy-it page on iTunes (which is not a notability-assisting source) and the nominal verification of one of its unexceptional chart positions -- and even when I refimproved the band's article the other day, I found virtually no coverage at all that would bolster the notability of the album: the band's initial coverage was entirely in the context of the modestly popular (but not a megahit) single "Soul City" rather than the whole album, and then after that they jumped straight to the "one-hit wonders try for comeback" phase of their careers without the album itself getting any non-trivial attention at all. Basically, there's just no substantive reason why the album needs its own standalone article independently of having its title listed in the band's discography. Bearcat (talk) 22:04, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:12, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:13, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:13, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:26, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Merge are redirect to The Partland Brothers. While it may well have received print coverage from its time of release that is not available online, there isn't sufficient basis for an article at this time. The chart position and maybe the cited description of the album could be added to the band article. --Michig (talk) 10:02, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
Merge with article on The Partland Brothers - the article on the album does not say much apart from the fact this article was the Partland Brothers' debut album and track listing. Vorbee (talk) 20:04, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.