Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elena Perseil

:{{la|Elena Perseil}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Elena Perseil}})

Recreation of a speedily deleted article. Minor mention in a minor source, insufficient to establish notability at this point. — Racconish^Tk 17:37, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

• Delete I didn't immediately nominate this one, thinking that sources might be found. But I doubt it. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 23:00, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
• Delete unless better sources are found. The first is a great start towards establishing notability, but it's definitely not enough. CityOfSilver 00:09, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

• Delete: Non notable as of yet. Another brand new designer with only advertorials to her name.--Aspro (talk) 00:29, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:34, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:34, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

• Speedy delete - per A7, so tagged. (If having one design mentioned in a magazine is enough to defeat A7, I give up) ukexpat (talk) 13:50, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

::Comment. Following your nomination, the page was speedily deleted again today and immediately recreated. Going through the Afd should avoid this per G4.— Racconish^Tk 15:24, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

:::Echoing the above sentiment by Racconish, I rejected speedy deletion on the article. It's probably easiest to let AfD run its course. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 15:03, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.