Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eliza Gamble

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. nomination withdrawn DGG ( talk ) 22:36, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

=[[Eliza Gamble]]=

:{{la|Eliza Gamble}} – (View AfD)(View log)

:({{findsources|Eliza Gamble}})

There appears to be no indication of importance. The article was previously tagged for this reason ( CSD A7), but another editor (not the creator) rejected this and removed the template. DoktorMandrake 00:53, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Keep. A [http://books.google.co.uk/books?um=1&ned=uk&hl=en&num=100&q=%22Eliza%20Gamble%22%20OR%20%22Eliza%20B.%20Gamble%22%20OR%20%22Eliza%20Burt%20Gamble%22&cf=all&sa=N&tab=np Google Books search] shows clear notability. I see that someone has already added some sources to the article. Phil Bridger (talk) 11:51, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Keep. The "find sources" tag should not be an empty formality: if you actually look at the gbooks link you find plenty of evidence of notability. --Paularblaster (talk) 21:03, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Keep. Nomination withdrawn - sources have been added and importance is now indicated. DoktorMandrake 22:05, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.