Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Conboy
=[[Elizabeth Conboy]]=
:{{la|Elizabeth Conboy}} – (
:({{Find sources|Elizabeth Conboy}})
fails WP:GNG, also there are some verifiability and blp issues going on Go Phightins! (talk) 12:28, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
- Delete - It appears that she hasn't established a significant career yet, I found one relevant link [http://www.hobsons-international.com/voices/661/elizabeth_conboy here], a talent agency profile. SwisterTwister talk 20:55, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 21:21, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 21:21, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
- Delete - Simply does not appear to satisfy WP:GNG requirements. -- WikHead (talk) 11:14, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
- Delete as per the above. Early days yet, however, and WP:USUAL applies - if she lands a notable role or comes to greater prominence in some other way, an article may yet be justified. As it stands, however, this article is premature. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 18:29, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
- Delete - Evidently not (yet) sufficiently notable. Kooky2 (talk) 14:13, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.